0 votes
by (200 points)

Google's private browsing options may not be as incognito as you'd expect.

New research into Google's ‘filter bubbles,' in which search results are personalized based on the data it's collected about you, has found that logging out or switching to Incognito Mode does almost nothing to shield you from targeted results.

By comparing search results for controversial topics, jules jordan including gun control, immigration, and vaccinations, the study (notably conducted by rival search engine, DuckDuckGo) uncovered significant variations in what different users were shown.

Scroll down for video 

New research into Google's ‘filter bubbles,' in which search results are personalized based on the data it's collected about you, has found that logging out or switching to Incognito Mode does almost nothing to shield you from targeted results. File photo

New research into Google's ‘filter bubbles,' in which search results are personalized based on the data it's collected about you, has found that logging out or switching to Incognito Mode does almost nothing to shield you from targeted results.

File photo

Despite the common assumption that logging out or going Incognito provides anonymity, points out that this isn't really the case.

Websites use several other identifying factors to keep tabs on users' activity, kelly madison (you can try Duckduckgo.com) including IP addresses.

To highlight the issue, DuckDuckGo recruited volunteers in the US to perform a series of searches for the terms ‘gun control,' ‘immigration,' and ‘vaccinations.'

All were tasked to do this at the same time, at 9pm ET on Sunday, June 24, in Incognito, logged out, and then logged back in.

The study also controlled for location, DuckDuckGo notes.

This made for 87 sets of results in total, with 76 desktop users and 11 mobile users.

Despite the anonymized conditions, which would be expected to produce the same results across the board, most of the participants still appeared to see personalized results.

Private searches for gun control, for example, yielded 62 different sets of results for the 76 participants.

By comparing search results for controversial topics, including gun control, immigration, and vaccinations, the study (notably conducted by rival search engine, DuckDuckGo) uncovered significant variations in what different users were shown. This is illustrated above

By comparing search results for controversial topics, including gun control, immigration, and vaccinations, the study (notably conducted by rival search engine, DuckDuckGo) uncovered significant variations in what different users were shown. This is illustrated above

DuckDuckGo recruited volunteers in the US to perform a series of searches for the terms ‘gun control,' ‘immigration,' and ‘vaccinations.' All were tasked to do this at the same time, at 9pm ET on Sunday, June 24, in Incognito. The study also controlled for location

DuckDuckGo recruited volunteers in the US to perform a series of searches for the terms ‘gun control,' ‘immigration,' and ‘vaccinations.' All were tasked to do this at the same time, at 9pm ET on Sunday, June 24, in Incognito.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Welcome to My QtoA, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...